The Amar Ekushey Boi Mela, traditionally a celebration of literature, ideas, and Bengali culture, has recently become a focal point for a heated debate extending beyond books. The controversy erupted when a group demanded the removal of Taslima Nasrin’s books from a stall, resulting in a confrontation that led to the temporary closure of the stall. This incident raises important questions about freedom of expression, cultural sensitivity, and the role of the fair in fostering intellectual dialogue. The Boi Mela has long been a symbol of identity and intellectual freedom, where people from diverse backgrounds come together to celebrate literature and culture. However, the shutdown of the stall suggests that some ideas, particularly those that challenge traditional beliefs, might not be welcome. This creates a dilemma for the fair, as it tries to balance open dialogue with respect for societal values, especially in a context where religion and tradition hold substantial influence. This situation extends beyond the clash over a single author or publisher. It poses a broader question about how to manage ideas that some find offensive, while upholding the right to free expression. Shutting down discussions or removing books, though perhaps intended to avoid conflict, risks undermining the very principles the Boi Mela stands for—allowing space for difficult conversations, which is crucial in a society that values free speech, as exemplified by the spirit of Ekushey February.